- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Clostridioides difficile concentration-dependant alterations in gut microbiota of asymptomatic infants
Gut Pathogens volume 17, Article number: 17 (2025)
Abstract
Background
Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridioides difficile is highly prevalent in early infancy, affecting approximately 40% of infants. This phenomenon offers a unique opportunity to study its impact on the gut microbiota without the confounding effects of disease. In this study, we analysed C. difficile-associated gut microbiome alterations in 76 asymptomatic infants, one year after receiving antibiotic treatment during early infancy. The presence and concentration of C. difficile were assessed in relation to gut microbiota structure and an extensive set of metadata.
Results
Bacterial gut community structure was characterized using 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing, while C. difficile concentration and the presence of the tcdB gene were quantified via digital PCR. C. difficile was detected in 36.8% of infants, with 10.5% testing positive for the tcdB gene. Significant alterations in gut microbiota were observed in relation to C. difficile concentration. Specifically, higher C. difficile loads were associated with reduced microbial diversity, greater deviations from average community structure, and co-occurrence with the genus Escherichia. Conversely, C. difficile colonization alone or the presence of the tcdB gene did not result in significant gut microbiota alterations. Additionally, no host-specific factors were significantly linked to C. difficile prevalence or concentration.
Conclusions
Asymptomatic carriage of C. difficile in neonates is not associated with significant gut microbiota alterations unless pathogen concentration is considered. Our findings suggest that elevated C. difficile proliferation occurs in dysbiotic infant gut microbiota, characterized by reduced alpha diversity and an increase in Escherichia.
Background
Prevalence of asymptomatic colonization with Clostridioides difficile in infants is estimated at approximately 40% [1], however varies considerably according to geographic location, age, breastfeeding, and underlying medical conditions [2, 3]. Colonization rates with both toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains peak in the first year of life before declining after the age of 2 [1, 4], with considerable disparities in reported prevalences across various studies [5,6,7,8]. However, symptomatic C. difficile infection (CDI) remains low in infants, ranging from 2.6 to 4 cases per 1000 admissions [9] and 7.24 to 12.80 CDI-related hospitalizations per 10.000 [10], both reported in the United States of America.
In adults, the development of CDI is often preceded by disruption in the gut microbiota leading to decreased colonization resistance [11]. The disruption is commonly attributed to antibiotic therapy, age, and other underlying gastrointestinal complications [12,13,14,15]. Consequently, the microbiota associated with CDI typically displays dysbiosis, characterized by lower diversity and reduced relative abundance of Bacteroidota (previously Bacteroidetes) and Bacillota (previously Firmicutes), with subsequent increase in Pseudomonadota (previously Proteobacteria) [16]. Notably, asymptomatic colonization with C. difficile has also been linked to adverse effects on gut microbiota composition, suggesting the bacterium’s active role in inducing alterations to facilitate its own proliferation [17, 18]. This phenomenon has been further demonstrated in vitro, showing ribotype-specific effect of C. difficile on infant’s gut microbiota [19] and adult dysbiotic microbiota [20].
Understanding of gut microbiota in correlation to C. difficile in infants remains limited to a few studies. The most notable among them is a large study involving longitudinal surveillance of 817 children up to 2 years of age, which found no significant association between C. difficile colonization and specific gut microbiota characteristics [3]. Conversely, other studies have reported conflicting results, with some indicating reduced microbiota diversity [21, 22], while others suggest increased diversity in C. difficile colonized children [5]. Additionally, the taxa found to be differentially abundant vary considerably across studies, underscoring substantial, unexplained cohort-specific variability.
In this study, we present findings on C. difficile colonization and concentration-specific microbiota characteristics in a cohort of 76 infants who received antibiotic therapy during neonatal period. Furthermore, we explore potential risk factors associated with C. difficile status by analysing extensive metadata collected at an early age.
Methods
Sample collection
The stool samples used in this study were collected as part of a previously published study [23]. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at three Slovenian neonatal units between November 2016 and March 2019. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02865564) and received approval from the National Medical Ethics Committee (No. 89/03/15). Detailed methodologies are provided in [23]. Briefly, stool samples used in this study were obtained from 76 infants along with clinical, anthropometric, demographic and feeding data. The inclusion criteria into original study were antibiotic administration for suspected early or late neonatal sepsis for at least five days (ampicillin/flucloxacillin and gentamicin), at the age of less than 21 days, and gestational age of at least 37 weeks. In present study, we included only stool samples collected from these infants at follow-up visit, one year after the completion of antibiotic treatment. None of the infants included in this study were diagnosed with or actively treated for C. difficile infection during the study period.
Total DNA isolation
Stool samples were collected in sealed sterile containers and promptly refrigerated for less than 24 h before storage at − 80 °C for subsequent analyses. Initially, suspensions of stool samples weighing between 0.1 and 0.5 g were prepared in Ringer’s solution, diluted at a ratio of 1:100. Following centrifugation at 3600 g for 10 min at 10 °C, the resultant pellet underwent lysis and sonication according to the methodology outlined by Matijašić et al. 2014 [24]. DNA extraction was then carried out using the automated Maxwell 16 System protocol (Promega, USA).
C. difficile and tcdB quantification
Number of copies of C. difficile 16S rRNA gene and toxin tcdB gene were determined using digital PCR (dPCR) technology on the QX200 system (Bio-Rad, USA), employing ddPCR EvaGreen Supermix (Bio-Rad, USA) for fluorescence detection with C. difficile specific primers Fcdiff (5‘-TTGAGCGATTTACTTCGGTAAAGA-3’) and Rcdiff (5’-CCATCCTGTACTGGCTCACCT-3’) [25] and tcdB gene specific primers TcdB_398F (5’- GAAAGTCCAAGTTTACGCTCAAT-3’) and TcdB_399R (5’- GCTGCACCTAAACTTACACCA-3’) [26]. The dPCR analysis was performed to quantify the absolute number of copies of C. difficile per ng of DNA. To achieve this, droplet PCR events were normalized to the input DNA concentration, which was assessed using the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen™ dsDNA Assay (ThermoFisher, USA).
Microbiota 16S amplicon sequencing and statistical analysis
Bacterial community structure was acquired through targeted amplicon sequencing of the V3-V4 variable region of the 16S rRNA gene utilizing the primer pair Bakt_341F (5’-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3’)-Bakt_805R (5’-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3’) [17]. Sequencing was conducted on the MiSeq Illumina platform (2 × 300 bp, Illumina, USA). Sequence data processing involved quality filtering of reads and construction of Zero-radius Operational Taxonomic Unit (ZOTUs) using the UNOISE3 pipeline implemented in USEARCH v.11.0.667 [27, 28] with default settings except the addition of parameter -fastq-minlen 400 (fastq_filter command). Taxonomy was assigned using the RDP trainset (version 18). The sequencing data generated in this study are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number PRJNA954698.
Statistical analysis and visualization of the microbiome data was performed in R (v4.2.2, R Core Team, 2022) implementing packages ‘vegan’, ‘picante’ and ‘ggplot’. Alpha diversity was presented as Faith’s phylogenetic diversity calculated based on neighbour-joining tree constructed from ZOTU representative sequences and Shannon diversity index. Beta diversity analysis was conducted using Bray-Curtis dissimilarities. Differences in community composition between groups were evaluated with permutation-based test ANOSIM (R package ‘vegan’).
Results
Our dataset comprises 76 infants who all underwent antibiotic treatment within the first 3 weeks of life. Stool samples were collected one year after treatment completion. In our cohort, we observed a C. difficile colonization rate of 36.8% (95% CI: 26.0-47.7%), out of which 28.6% (95% CI: 11.9–45.3%) were toxigenic based on the presence of tcdB gene. None of the cases resulted in hospitalization due to C. difficile infection. Several cases reported diarrhoea in the previous 6 months (Table 1); however, its association with C. difficile was not confirmed (clinical investigations have not been performed).
Subject metadata correlation with C. difficile colonization and concentration
C. difficile colonization and concentration was analysed in relation to an extensive set of subject metadata. Risk for C. difficile colonization did not significantly correlate with metadata collected, including factors typically associated with CDI in adults such as antibiotic use and hospitalization (Table 1).
C. difficile concentration dependant alterations in gut microbiota composition
C. difficile colonization was in our cohort not associated with specific microbial community structure characteristics. No significant differences were found in either alpha diversity (Shannon diversity, p = 0.235; Faith’s phylogenetic diversity, p = 0.245) or beta diversity (ANOSIM, p = 0.369) (Fig. 1A and B). Furthermore, among C. difficile colonized, no differences between tcdB positive and negative samples were found in either alpha (Shannon diversity, p = 0.980; Faith’s phylogenetic diversity, p = 0.823) or beta diversity (ANOSIM, p = 0.220) (Fig. 1B). Finally, population level analysis did not yield any differentially abundant taxa between C. difficile colonized and non-colonized infants.
On the other hand, we found strong associations between microbiome composition and C. difficile concentration. Higher concentration of C. difficile was significantly positively correlated with the mean Bray-Curtis dissimilarity from the cohort average (Spearman’s rho = 0.595, p = 0.001; Fig. 1C), indicating alterations in community composition, found to be predominantly associated with decreased alpha diversity. While concentration-associated decreases in both richness and diversity were observed (observed ZOTUs, p = 0.016; Shannon diversity, p = 0.017; Shannon evenness, p = 0.044; Supplementary Fig. 1), the correlation was most significant with Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (Spearman’s rho = -0.514, p = 0.005, Fig. 1D). The lowest alpha diversity was observed in samples with highest concentrations of C. difficile, but group minimum values were comparable to those observed in the group of C. difficile non-colonized infants, therefore not indicating any exacerbating effect of C. difficile colonization on dysbiosis-like features in gut microbiota. Among detected ZOTUs, the one linked to C. difficile (ZOTU171) exhibited strongest positive correlation with increasing mean Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (Pearson’s r = 0.427, p < 0.001). Along with negative correlation observed with Fusicatenibacter (ZOTU13) (Pearson’s r = -0.470, p < 0.001), these two represented the only taxa significantly correlated with mean Bray-Curtis dissimilarity beyond false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 (Supplementary Fig. 2). C. difficile concentration also positively correlated with the relative abundance of Escherichia, with the correlation most evident at the highest concentrations of C. difficile (Spearman’s rho = 0.585, p = 0.001) (Fig. 1E).
C. difficile associated gut microbial community characteristics. (A) C. difficile colonization associated characteristics presented with non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot illustrating beta diversity using Bray-Curtis dissimilarities, with colours indicating C. difficile colonization status and dot size representing C. difficile concentration. (B) Alpha diversity analysis depicted by Shannon diversity and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity. (C, D and E) C. difficile concentration (ddPCR; copies per ng DNA) associated changes in (C) mean Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, (D) Faith’s phylogenetic diversity and (E) Escherichia/Shigella (ZOTU1) relative abundance. All correlations are supported with Spearman’s rho and significance
Discussion
The predominantly asymptomatic carriage of C. difficile in infants is well documented, yet it still presents certain diagnostic challenges. However, it also offers an opportunity to study C. difficile dynamics in the absence of disease. In this study, we report C. difficile concentration-associated alterations in the gut microbiome of 76 asymptomatic one year old infants, all of whom received antibiotic therapy during the first three weeks of life.
In our cohort, C. difficile was detected in 36.8% of the infants, consistent with the 41% colonisation prevalence reported in a systematic review of 95 studies [1]. Additionally, our prevalence of toxigenic C. difficile at 10.5% is comparable to the 14% reported in the same review [1] and the 7.1% reported by Rousseau et al. [6], while significantly lower than the 40% reported by Mani et al. [3]. It is most likely that infants acquire C. difficile from the environment, as indicated by its lower prevalence immediately after birth [3]. The potential sources are numerous, as C. difficile is commonly found in both hospital and home environments, including pets [7, 29]. In our study, none of the collected environmental factors were associated with C. difficile prevalence, including typical adult risk factors such as antibiotic use and hospitalization [30, 31]. Higher C. difficile prevalence has also been reported in non-breastfed infants [3, 7, 32], Caesarean deliveries, and infants with diarrhoea [7], none of which was confirmed as statistically significant in our cohort.
No statistically significant differences in microbial community structure were associated solely with either C. difficile colonization or toxigenic strain colonization. Previous studies have reported a C. difficile colonization-associated decrease in diversity [21, 22], a feature typically seen in adult CDI cases. However, the most comprehensive studies to date, in agreement with ours, did not confirm these findings in infants [3, 6]. In contrast to earlier studies, we did not identify any differentially abundant taxa between C. difficile-colonized and non-colonized infants. However, the reported taxa tend to be largely study-specific [3, 6, 21, 22].
We did, however, observe significant alterations in the gut microbiota related to C. difficile concentration, particularly lower phylogenetic diversity. Importantly, samples with large deviations from the population average and low microbial abundance were found in both C. difficile-colonized and non-colonized groups. This suggests that disrupted microbiota supports better growth of C. difficile while we found no indications that the presence of C. difficile further exacerbates microbiota disruption. High C. difficile concentrations were also positively correlated with increased Escherichia relative abundance, a co-occurrence previously described in murine model [33]. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to investigate C. difficile concentration-associated alterations in the gut microbiota of infants. Studies in adults have reported different alterations, mainly a negative correlation between C. difficile concentration and Clostridium scindens, as well as different Blautia species [34, 35]. However, adult microbiota differs significantly from that in early childhood, which likely affects C. difficile interactions and contributes to the frequent symptomatic disease seen in adults compared to the high prevalence of asymptomatic carriage in infants. Therefore, future studies are required to further validate our observations.
A significant limitation of our study is the small sample size, particularly regarding the statistical analyses performed on the subgroup of C. difficile-positive subjects. The observed associations with metadata, influenced by the heterogeneity of the analysed cohort, would greatly benefit from validation in a larger cohort. Furthermore, all children included in this study received antibiotic therapy within the first three weeks after birth, which potentially influenced the development of their microbiota, and the subsequent C. difficile colonization associated microbiota characteristics.
Conclusion
Our study of 76 asymptomatic infants found that C. difficile-associated alterations in the gut microbiota, primarily lower microbial diversity and greater deviation from population averages, are closely linked to C. difficile concentration in the gut. Colonization alone, however, did not significantly alter the bacterial community structure. Furthermore, no host-specific factors from the extensive metadata were significantly correlated with either colonization status or C. difficile concentration.
Data availability
The sequencing data generated in this study are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number PRJNA954698.
References
Tougas SR, Lodha N, Vandermeer B, Lorenzetti DL, Tarr PI, Tarr GAM, et al. Prevalence of detection of clostridioides difficile among asymptomatic children: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2021. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2328
Boyanova L, Kalvatchev N, Yordanov D, Hadzhiyski P, Markovska R, Gergova G, et al. Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile carriage in asymptomatic children since 2010: a narrative review. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2019;33:1228–36.
Mani J, Levy S, Angelova A, Hazrati S, Fassnacht R, Subramanian P, et al. Epidemiological and Microbiome associations of clostridioides difficile carriage in infancy and early childhood. Gut Microbes. 2023;15:2203969.
McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, Coffin SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA) and society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:e1–48.
Couturier J, Lepage P, Jolivet S, Delannoy J, Mesa V, Ancel PY, et al. Gut microbiota diversity of preterm neonates is associated with clostridioides difficile colonization. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fcimb.2022.907323
Rousseau C, Lemée L, Le Monnier A, Poilane I, Pons JL, Collignon A. Prevalence and diversity of clostridium difficile strains in infants. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60:1112–8.
Stoesser N, Eyre DW, Quan TP, Godwin H, Pill G, Mbuvi E, et al. Epidemiology of clostridium difficile in infants in Oxfordshire, UK: risk factors for colonization and carriage, and genetic overlap with regional C. difficile infection strains. PLoS ONE. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0182307
Ferraris L, Couturier J, Eckert C, Delannoy J, Barbut F, Butel MJ, et al. Carriage and colonization of C. difficile in preterm neonates: A longitudinal prospective study. PLoS ONE. 2019. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0212568
Kim J, Smathers SA, Prasad P, Leckerman KH, Coffin S, Zaoutis T. Epidemiological features of clostridium difficile-associated disease among inpatients at children’s hospitals in the united States, 2001–2006. Pediatrics. 2008;122(6):1266–70.
Zilberberg MD, Tillotson GS, McDonald C. Clostridium difficile infections among hospitalized children, united States, 1997–2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(4):604–9.
Pike CM, Theriot CM. Mechanisms of colonization resistance against clostridioides difficile. J Infect Dis. 2021;223(3):S194–200.
Miller AC, Arakkal AT, Sewell DK, Segre AM, Tholany J, Polgreen PM, et al. Comparison of different antibiotics and the risk for Community-Associated clostridioides difficile infection: A Case–Control study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ofid/ofad413
Berkell M, Mysara M, Xavier BB, van Werkhoven CH, Monsieurs P, Lammens C, et al. Microbiota-based markers predictive of development of clostridioides difficile infection. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2241.
Dalal RS, Allegretti JR. Diagnosis and management of clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2021;37(4):336–43.
Lee AA, Rao K, Limsrivilai J, Gillilland M, Malamet B, Briggs E, et al. Temporal gut microbial changes predict recurrent clostridiodes difficile infection in patients with and without ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020;26(11):1748–58.
Vasilescu IM, Chifiriuc MC, Pircalabioru GG, Filip R, Bolocan A, Lazăr V, et al. Gut dysbiosis and clostridioides difficile infection in neonates and adults. Front Microbiol. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2021.651081
Mahnic A, Pintar S, Skok P, Rupnik M. Gut community alterations associated with clostridioides difficile colonization in hospitalized gastroenterological patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease. Front Microbiol. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2022.988426
Zhang L, Dong D, Jiang C, Li Z, Wang X, Peng Y. Insight into alteration of gut microbiota in clostridium difficile infection and asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. Anaerobe. 2015;34:1–7.
Horvat S, Mahnic A, Makuc D, Pečnik K, Plavec J, Rupnik M. Children gut microbiota exhibits a different composition and metabolic profile after in vitro exposure to clostridioides difficile and increases its sporulation. Front Microbiol. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1042526
Horvat S, Rupnik M. Interactions between clostridioides difficile and fecal microbiota in in vitro batch model: growth, sporulation, and microbiota changes. Front Microbiol. 2018. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01633
Chen LA, Hourigan SK, Grigoryan Z, Gao Z, Clemente JC, Rideout JR, et al. Decreased fecal bacterial diversity and altered Microbiome in children colonized with clostridium difficile. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;68(4):502–8.
Ling Z, Liu X, Jia X, Cheng Y, Luo Y, Yuan L, et al. Impacts of infection with different toxigenic clostridium difficile strains on faecal microbiota in children. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1):7485.
Krivec JL, Bratina P, Valcl A, Manfreda KL, Petrovčič A, Benedik E, et al. Effects of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in neonates exposed to antibiotics: a randomised controlled trial. Beneficial Microbes. 2024;1:1–13.
Matijašić BB, Obermajer T, Lipoglavšek L, Grabnar I, Avguštin G, Rogelj I. Association of dietary type with fecal microbiota in vegetarians and omnivores in Slovenia. Eur J Nutr. 2014;53(4):1051–64.
Rinttilä T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, Krogius L, Palva A. Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and Indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(6):1166–77.
van den Berg RJ, Kuijper EJ, van Coppenraet LESB, Claas ECJ. Rapid diagnosis of toxinogenic clostridium difficile in faecal samples with internally controlled real-time PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(2):184–6.
Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2460–1.
Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(16):2194–200.
Rodriguez-Diaz C, Seyboldt C, Rupnik M. Non-human clostridioides difficile reservoirs and sources: animals, food, environment. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1435:329–50.
Brown K, Valenta K, Fisman D, Simor A, Daneman N. Hospital ward antibiotic prescribing and the risks of clostridium difficile infection. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):626–33.
Webb BJ, Subramanian A, Lopansri B, Goodman B, Jones PB, Ferraro J, et al. Antibiotic exposure and risk for Hospital-Associated clostridioides difficile infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/AAC.02169-19
Jangi S, Lamont JT. Asymptomatic colonization by clostridium difficile in infants: implications for disease in later life. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51(1):2–7.
Schubert AM, Sinani H, Schloss PD. Antibiotic-Induced alterations of the murine gut microbiota and subsequent effects on colonization resistance against clostridium difficile. mBio. 2015. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/mBio.00974-15
Buffie CG, Bucci V, Stein RR, McKenney PT, Ling L, Gobourne A, et al. Precision Microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to clostridium difficile. Nature. 2014. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nature13828
Daquigan N, Seekatz AM, Greathouse KL, Young VB, White JR. High-resolution profiling of the gut Microbiome reveals the extent of clostridium difficile burden. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41522-017-0043-0
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgments.
Funding
The work was supported by the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (Record no. P3-0395, P4-0097), internal research funding from the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia (Record ID–20150021) and ARIS SF Infrastructure core activity (Record no. P3-0387).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: J.L.K., E.B., D.P.P., A.M.; data acquisition: J.L.K., A.M., P.B., A.V., T.O.; analysis and interpretation of data: A.M., J.L.K., T.O., B.B.M., A.M.; drafting the manuscript: A.M., J.L.K., M.R.; critically revising manuscript, approved final version and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work: A.M., J.L.K., M.R., P.B., A.V., E.B., T.O., B.B.M., D.P.P.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02865564) and received approval from the National Medical Ethics Committee (No. 89/03/15). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the legal requirements of the study country. Informed consent was obtained from the parent or legal guardian of each neonate after written and verbal study information was provided.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mahnic, A., Krivec, J.L., Paro-Panjan, D. et al. Clostridioides difficile concentration-dependant alterations in gut microbiota of asymptomatic infants. Gut Pathog 17, 17 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13099-025-00687-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13099-025-00687-3